A study of the Ancient Treaties of Assize and Winchester, with the Magna Carta and the PRE 1872 US Constitution You’ll discover the BARfias did NOT Exist …. OMG Save the Queen ….. ROFLMFAO
by SE Baldwin – 1917 – Cited by 11 – Related articles founded in 1865, met in 1877, in Saratoga, New York. It had long had a ….. a meeting of leading lawyers at Saratoga, N. Y., August 21st 1878, to discuss the …
The Abolition Riot of 1836 took place in Boston, Massachusetts (U.S.) in the Massachusetts …. Another accused Sewall of disgracing the legal profession and called for his censure by the bar for “instigating a mob of negroes to perpetrate an act …
This is a timeline of the history of the city of Boston, US. This is a dynamic list and may never be …. Samuel Turell Armstrong becomes mayor. Abolition Riot of 1836 ….. MuckRock headquartered in Boston. Island Creek Oyster Bar in business.
Before I ever studied law I used to argue occasionally with lawyers – a ….. was constitutional this year which had been unconstitutional only last year, then even …
No lawyer will like this book. It isn’t written for lawyers. It is written for the average man and its purpose is to try to plant in his head, at the least, a seed of skepticism about the whole legal profession, its works and its ways. In case anyone should be interested, I got my own skepticism early. Before I ever studied law I used to argue occasionally with lawyers – a foolish thing to do at any time. When, as frequently happened, they couldn’t explain their legal points so that they made any sense to me I brashly began to suspect that maybe they didn’t make any sense at all. But I couldn’t know. One of the reasons I went to law school was to try to find out. At law school I was lucky. Ten of the men under whom I took courses were sufficiently skeptical and common-sensible about the branches of law they were teaching so that, unwittingly of course, they served together to fortify my hunch about the phoniness of the whole legal process. In a sense, they are the intellectual godfathers of this book. And though all of them would doubtless strenuously disown their godchild, I think I owe it to them to name them. Listed alphabetically, they are: Thurman Arnold, now Assistant Attorney-General of the United States; Charles E. Clark, now Judge of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; William O’ Douglas, now Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court; Felix Frankfurter, now Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court; Leon Green, now Dean of the Northwestern University Law School; Walton Hamilton, Professor of Law at Yale University; Harold Laski, Professor of Political Science at the London School of Economics; Richard Joyce Smith, now a practicing attorney in New York City; Wesley Sturges, now Director of the Distilled Spirits Institute; and the late Lee Tulin. By the time I got through law school, I had decided that I never wanted to practice law. I never have. I am not a member of any bar. If anyone should want, not unreasonably, to know what on earth I am doing – or trying to do – teaching law, he may find a hint of the answer toward the end of Chapter IX. When I was mulling over the notion of writing this book, I outlined my ideas about the book, and about the law, to a lawyer who is not only able but also extraordinarily frank and perceptive about his profession. “Sure,” he said, “but why give the show away?” That clinched it.
“The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
“The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, An association is not license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same….
Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins – 2008 – Preview – More editionsThis volume covers American law from the earliest settlement and colonization of North America.
WHAT IS A NEXT OF FRIEND
See next friend — One acting without formal appointment as guardian for the benefit of an infant or person of unsound mind not judicially declared incompetent, or other person under some disability. This disability often arises from minority, mental incapacity, or lack of access to counsel.
A next friend has full power over the proceedings in the action as if he or she were an ordinary plaintiff, until a guardian or guardian ad litem is appointed in the case; but the next friend is entitled to present evidence only on the same basis as any other witness.
The McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a court of law in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia by prompting, taking notes and quietly giving advice.
They need not be legally trained or have any professional legal qualifications.
The right to a McKenzie friend was established in the 1970 case of McKenzie v McKenzie.[1] Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area and the presumption is heavily in favour of admitting a McKenzie friend into court.[2] He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person[citation needed] but is not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
A similar, modified principle exists in Singapore. The role is distinct from that of a next friend or of an amicus curiae.
NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “Unauthorized practice of law.”
The power of the States to control the practice of law cannot be exercised so as to abrogate federally protected rights. NAACP v. Button,371 U.S. 415 (1963); Sperry v. Florida,373 U.S. 379 (1963)
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972). Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973). “Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who ‘takes on the mantel of sovereign’,”
“The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) “The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A association is not license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same….
The [Plymouth] colony’s first trained lawyer, Thomas Lechford, did little to instill enthusiasm. He was disbarred for trying to influence a jury. Antilawyer sentiment was pervasive elsewhere as well, and the “ancient English prejudice against lawyers secured new strength in America.” The framers of the Fundamental Constitutions of the Carolinas in 1669 declared it a “base and vile thing to plead for money or reward.” Connecticut and Virginia during a portion of the seventeenth century prohibited lawyers from practicing. Early lawyers were often laymen helping friends or women serving the legal interests of absent husbands. (Hall 21-22)
Still, despite the opposition to lawyers–perhaps arising from the complex and seemingly arbitrary rules of the early common-law system–the complexity of colonial legal life (each part of the colonies tended to have its own legal rules which more-or-less approximated some part of the very complex English system), and the importance of smoothing out trade, meant that lawyers became increasingly valued. Although there were no law schools, a “rough apprenticeship” process, along with self-teaching, emerged to prepare attorneys.
But unlike in England, according to Hall and Karsten, there was never sufficient legal business to justify splitting the profession into barristers and solicitors. Instead, “American lawyers survived as generalists” (Hall 22).
It was not until after the Revolution that some moves to formalize legal training emerged, but even though Harvard, Yale and Columbia started legal training in the mid-nineteenth century, it wasn’t until the late nineteenth and early twentieth century that the law school system as we know it today developed.
The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. This acclaimed narrative history examines how law has influenced American social, political, economic, and cultural events, as well as how those events inevitably influenced the law itself, from the earliest English settlements to 2007.
The Fifth Amendment provides that federal prosecutions for capital or otherwise infamous crimes must be [350 U.S. 359, 362] instituted by presentments or indictments of grand juries. But neither the Fifth Amendment nor any other constitutional provision prescribes the kind of evidence upon which grand juries must act. The grand jury is an English institution, brought to this country by the early colonists and incorporated in the Constitution by the Founders. There is every reason to believe that our constitutional grand jury was intended to operate substantially like its English progenitor. The basic purpose of the English grand jury was to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes. Grand jurors were selected from the body of the people and their work was not hampered by rigid procedural or evidential rules. In fact, grand jurors could act on their own knowledge and were free to make their presentments or indictments on such information as they deemed satisfactory. Despite its broad power to institute criminal proceedings the grand jury grew in popular favor with the years. It acquired an independence in England free from control by the Crown or judges. Its adoption in our Constitution as the sole method for preferring charges in serious criminal cases shows the high place it held as an instrument of justice. And in this country as in England of old the grand jury has convened as a body of laymen, free from technical rules, acting in secret, pledged to indict no one because of prejudice and to free no one because of special favor. As late as 1927 an English historian could say that English grand juries were still free to act on their own knowledge if they pleased to do so. 5 And in 1852 Mr. Justice Nelson on circuit could say “No case has been cited, nor have we been able to find any, furnishing an authority for looking into and revising the judgment of the grand jury upon the evidence, for the purpose of [350 U.S. 359, 363] determining whether or not the finding was founded upon sufficient proof . . . .” United States v. Reed, 27 Fed. Cas. 727, 738.
In political philosophy, the right of revolution (or right of rebellion) is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without cause. Stated throughout history in one form or another, the belief in this right has been used to justify various revolutions, including the American Revolution, French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the Iranian Revolution.
RIGHT OF REVOLUTION. The right of revolution is not a right that is defined and protected by the Constitution but a natural right. It would be absurd for a constitution to authorize revolutionary challenges to its authority. However, it would not have been absurd for the preamble to the Constitution to have acknowledged the right of revolution, as, for example, the preamble to the pennsylvania …
The Right of Revolution exists outside of government. The Right of Revolution is inextricably linked to our most basic right, the Right of Self-Preservation. We are endowed with Rights from our Prime Creator. The Bill of Rights and this statement in the Declaration were meant as warnings to the newly created government of the United States.
Carl Becker, the late, eminent Cornell University historian, in his book The Declaration of Independence, argued that the famous second paragraph of the Declaration is “a frank assertion of the…
dictionary.sensagent.com/Right of revolution/en-en
Origins
Use in History
The Right of Revolution as An Individual Or Collective Right
Duty Versus Right
Preconditions to The Right of Revolution
Natural Law Or Positive Law
See Also
External Links
The right of revolution was perhaps first articulated as part of an official state philosophy by the Zhou Dynasty (1122 – 256 BC) of China. To justify their overthrowing of the earlier Shang Dynasty, the Zhou kings promulgated the concept known as the Mandate of Heaven, that Heaven would bless the authority of a just ruler, but would be displeased and withdraw its mandate from a despotic ruler. The Mandate of Heaven would then transfer to those who would rule best. Chinese historians interpre…
What others called the right of resistance or the right of revolution is at bottom the natural right of preservation. The supporting case was developed with bold thought and cautious speech by John Locke, whose Second Treatise(no. 2) rightly was regarded by many of the Founders as a fit
In political philosophy, the right of rebellion (or right of revolution) is the right or duty, variously stated throughout history, of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests. Belief in this right extends back to ancient China, and it has been used throughout history to justify various rebellions, including the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
The US Postal Services Crimes ie Mail Fraud is being used by the COLONY RIDGES Gang in Texas to Perpetrate, Further and Continue the Many Thousands of FRAUDS associated with the THREE FEDERAL CASES ongoing in Houston Federal Court.
WEBDec 20, 2023 — – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Justice Department today sued Colony Ridge, a Texas-based developer and lender, for …
WEBDec 20, 2023 — The Justice Department and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today sued Colony Ridge, a Texas-based developer and lender, for operating an illegal …
WEBMar 14, 2024 — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued the Colony Ridge development in Liberty County for deceptive trade practices, fraud in real estate …
WEBSep 21, 2020 — The revelations in these documents give us one trillion reasons to urgently update our laws to combat money laundering and end hidden ownership. This Congress …
WEBJul 26, 2019 — HUD FHA OCFPB OCC Treasury FBI and DOJ need to explain the CHURNING of the Predatory Foreclosures and how Laundered Trillions are the …
— This is “Looting Trillions Laundering Trillions 84 Captures” by Isacc Witham on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them. Solutions . …
The US Postal Services ie Mail Fraud is being used by the COLONY RIDGES Gang to Perpetrate, Further and Continue the Many Thousands of FRAUDS associated with the THREE FEDERAL CASES ongoing in Houston Federal Court. Yes CFPB, DOJ and Texas State Attorney General’s Lawsuits all FRAUD CASES There are THOUSANDS of Colony Ridges all over the United States
WEBA web page that exposes the corruption and fraud of the US banking system, the real estate industry, and the government. It features testimonials, videos, links, and documents that …
Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins
The Houston CON / Mud Flat…[W]e find in the records of the land office, even in the early days of our Republic, …
WEBApr 27, 2015 · A web page that exposes the massive real estate and mortgage frauds that looted trillions of dollars from the US economy. It contains links to other sites that claim …
WEBJudson Witham appeals the district court’s order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), his civil complaint in which he asserted claims against various. New …
WEBA blog post that rants about various scandals and conspiracies involving the US government, the CIA, the FBI, the Clintons, the Bushes, and the Trumps. It mentions Judson Witham, a former FBI agent, but does not …
WEBDecided: January 24, 2022 PER CURIAM: Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint …
WEBJul 24, 2024 · May 15, 1975 — Fla officials uncover what might be largest land fraud swindle in history of US, involving thousands of victims and up to $1-billion in lost … The …
WEBS&L Fraud Bank Looting Land Swindle … (Eagle Title) was a very, very, very widespread CRIME during the S&L and Bank Looting Days. Judson Witham has been RIGHT all along, …
WEBSep 2, 2017 · A web page that exposes the land frauds and scams in Texas, involving Judson Witham, JP Morgan Chase, FHA, HUD, and other players. It claims that trillions of …
WEBApr 18, 2024 · Seeing as how more than 1.1 TRILLION DOLLARS has been Looted from the American People (your tax dollars hard at work), I am requesting that this page be as …
Watching all the Witnesses featured in THE CON and having begun exposing these POSTAL SWINDLES back in 1982 I suppose a FOIA demand is inorder, The Records, Files and Emails as well as the FBI , DOJ and FinCen memoranda and interagency memos regarding HOW these Profits and Dirty Revenues are used to FURTHER the Crimes and Civil Frauds / RICO Activities are incorporated in the FURTHERING and Continued Perpetuation of these SWINDLES is in order. THE US Government and other Foreign Governments have imposed and collected BILLIONS of Dollars in fines and I would suggest THE CONSUMING PUBLIC the Victims of these SWINDLES have a Right to know just how the MONEY IS LAUNDERED using the Business Operations AND The Mortgage Operations of JP Morgan, Deutsche, Credit Swiss and all the other BUNDLERS of these Predatory, Subprime, NINJA Laons and LIARS Loans associated with TRILLIONS in Fraudulent, Deceptive and Predatory, Subprime Mortgages. THE AUtomobile and Truck CHURNING Loans and other Financial Products financed with the Ill-Gotten UNJUST ENRICHMENT and Unlawful Business Activities of these Banks THOSE files and Records are Requested under FOIA.
It appears that Trey Gowdy and the Trump Administration is intimately involved here AS Epstein and Associates ( Jeff Epstein ) and many other Trading and Brokering Houses of Wall Street have been. I am requesting Records and Files, EMails and Interagency Communications that reveal JUST HOW BIG This Mountain of CRIMINAL SHIT IS. IT APPEARS that THE CON and Professor William Blacks Film Makers have been scratching the surface with allegations of OBSTRUCTION of Justice and Collusion with these BANKSTERS and Mortgage Brokering MOBSTERS like the Gerald Cugno Family and Their Mortgage Swindling Operations in Florida. From DOCX and LPS to Taylor Bean and Whitacker to Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citi, Black Rock Financial, Western Banks, RLG and Westgate Holdings, VAST NUMBERS of Mortgage Retailers, Mortgage Brokers and countless other Banks have IT IS OBVIOUS, Robbed, Looted, Cheated and Swindled countless Millions in these Mortgage SCAMS.
1. Please produce the Money Laundering Methods that Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Credit Suisse and GERALD CUGNO’s operations used to FUND the Mortgages they have with MONEY LAUNDERING ACTIVITY. 2. Produce the Records and Information that reveal the OTHER Banks, Brokers, Investment Houses, Title Insurance Companies and Servicers/ Pretender Lenders/ and Pretender Servicers that have acted to FURTHER THESE Swindles using the US Mails and Interstate/ Transnational Wire and State Systems to further the Swindles, Scams and Money Laundering.
I suggest ALL herein involved view THE CON and understand that 5 more episodes are coming and so Please Watch all 10 Episodes and while Your at it, FHA, HUD, FBI, FinCen, The Federal Reserve and TREY GOWDY / Nelson and Mullins / Donald Trump and Baker and Donnelson ALL need to Produce Their Records and Files as well.
Please produce all these Files, Records, Emails, Inter-agency Communications and Information IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT.Please Produce the First 100 Pages of Information for Free.
The rest of the Materials Should be produced IN THE PUBLIC’s INTERESTS and as Such COMPLETE FEE WAIVER is Herein Demanded. I mean IF the American People have to Pay for these CRUMBS Scams and Swindles, The FOIA Materials should be produced for FREE. Perhaps TREY GOWDY and JOHN BAXTER and Donald Trump care to share Their Views ?
From writer/director Eric Vaughan, producer Patrick Lovell and executive producer Adam Bronfman, The Con is an in-depth investigation into the 2008 financial crisis nine years in the making, Who did it, why it happened and how our country went from “of, for and by the people,” to “of, for and by the corporation.” And what’s past is prologue: The heist of our democracy that includes fraudulent practices, massive …
The Con — ABRAMORAMAhttps://www.abramorama.com/film/2020/theconIn the gripping original five-part docuseries THE CON, filmmaker Patrick Lovell investigates what happened, beginning with personal stories — including the foreclosure of his own Utah home, and the suicide of a 91-year-old widow in Akron, Ohio — before zooming out to examine the corrupt systems that doomed the United States to government funded bailouts that would only perpetuate a predatory …
Time magazine built a cover story around the claims of an unnamed source they called “Mustafa” who insisted he was part of a 1,500-man “black network” of BCCI thugs who collaborated with the CIA.
Danny Casolaro (June 16, 1947 – August 10, 1991) was an investigative reporter investigating Mena Airport, the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Iran-Contra, the Inslaw case, and the BCCI scandal. Casolaro was nearing the end of his project and told friends he was about to publish something really big, a book that tied together the scandals surrounding the presidency of George H. W. Bush.
In the late 70’s, BCCI’s reach began to extend into the U.S., culminating in the secret acquisition of Financial General Bankshares of Washington in 1982. Six years later a federal grand jury in…
Mar 11, 2016 · He steered the bank’s founder, Hassan Abedi, toward Jimmy Carter’s budget director, Bert Lance, whose bank an Abedi front man took over. Stephens then helped clear the ground, according to …
Jul 13, 1991 · The Central Intelligence Agency used the Bank of Credit and Commerce International for intelligence operations before the bank was seized last week by international regulators, according to …
Aug 01, 1991 · The Central Intelligence Agency mentioned First American only in passing in a long report on B.C.C.I.’s operations and origins, and that section was the only part declassified today.
GULF MANOR AIRPORT right next door to Hobby and Ellington Field was Run by Clarke Clifford and Roger Altman with the WEAPONS TRAFFICKERS ……
The Central Intelligence Agency said today that it prepared a report in 1986 stating that the Bank of Credit and Commerce International acquired control of Washington’s largest banking company in 1982.
Government officials outside the intelligence agency said the information on First American Bankshares Inc.’s ownership was distributed at the time to the State and Treasury Departments and possibly to other agencies.
The C.I.A. report is important because it shows that at least five years ago Government agencies had clear warning that the rogue international bank secretly owned First American. Officials at the Federal Reserve have said that because of questions about B.C.C.I.’s financing, they would never have permitted it to own an American bank if they had known. Federal Reserve officials said today that they did not remember seeing the C.I.A. report in 1986. Controlled Through Agents
Until today, the Federal Reserve and other authorities have said they could not document the foreign ownership of First American until last January. Clark M. Clifford, the prominent Washington lawyer and Democratic adviser, who is chairman of First American, has said he was unaware that foreign interests controlled the company.
Feb 16, 2005 · Khalid Bin Mafouz’s case in Britain is in the WikiLeaks trove, but just as important is that Mahfouz and Bath had bought the Houston Gulf Manor Airport in Houston for Salem Bin Laden, Osama’s brother who died in Cibolo, Texas in 1988 the same year that CIA agent Matthew Gannon was returning to the USA from the Middle East to press the CIA brass …
See Gulf Manor Airport …. Altman, Clifford and the … Salem bin Laden owned the airport for six years before his death in 1988. After Salem bin Laden died, the airport, now owned by his … Acting CIA director Richard Kerr quickly decided to go public with a part of the Agency’s relationship to what prosecutors have called the largest bank …
The bank has also been accused of knowingly handling the finances for drug dealers and international terrorists. On the first day of the hearings, Clark Clifford and Robert Altman, administrators…
Sep 03, 1991 · The two men borrowed from B.C.C.I. to buy shares in the holding company, Credit and Commerce American Holdings, that owned First American Bankshares…
Aug 19, 1991 · As early as June, Mr. Mathias, a director of First American since 1987, was urging the two men to consider stepping down to protect the bank from the scandal engulfing BCCI, according to the …
Feb 20, 2012 · When the BCCI Bank Officer in Tampa was later arrested for money laundering, he immediately rolled. No omerta here, signor. He told an undercover agent that his bank, BCCI, secretly owned First American Bancshares, a shady Washington DC bank being fronted by a man who called the Godfather of the Democratic Party, Clark Clifford.
Covert Action Information Bulletin No.39, Winter 1991-92
In early August 1991, the global scandal surrounding the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) hit the headlines, and linked the powerful financial institution with the CIA. Acting CIA director Richard Kerr quickly decided to go public with a part of the Agency’s relationship to what prosecutors have called the largest bank fraud of all time.
His choice of forum, a lecture to a group of U.S. high school students meeting at the National Press Club in Washington, was odd but rational. His chosen audience was obviously less prepared than journalists or members of Congress to ask tough questions about the Agency’s relationship to the drug-corrupted bank. Within this context, Kerr could put the information out in such a way that the CIA had total control over what was said and could thus cast it in an entirely positive light.
Kerr told the students that the bank’s global reach and ties to various Middle Eastern groups early on made it a key vehicle for intelligence-gathering by the Agency. At the same time, the Agency expanded its links with the bank, Kerr explained, both as a source for information on drug money laundering and drug trafficking, and as a mechanism for moving U.S. government funds. Because the bank operated branches in so many countries – some 73 around the world – the CIA used it also for moving Agency monies to its local assets. When the CIA found out the bank was engaged in improper activities, explained Kerr, it passed the information to federal law enforcement. Once it determined that the bank’s activities were criminal, the acting director stated, the CIA of course began reducing its operations with the bank, and stopped them completely by the end of 1988.
Acting Director Kerr had indeed chosen his audience well. None of the high school students challenged his superficial account of the CIA’s role with BCCI.
SNIP…
Add to this BCCI’s habit of making pay-offs to prominent public officials in a variety of countries around the world -pay-offs which BCCI insiders claim went to people close to the CIA – like General Zia ul-Haq of Pakistan, Manuel Noriega of Panama, and the leaders of the Afghan Mujahedeen.
Finally, consider the odd sale of the BCCI affiliate Banque de Commerce et Placements (BCP) in Geneva only two weeks after the closure of BCCI on July 5, 1991.
It seems that the President of BCP, Alfred Hartmann, was simultaneously on the Board of Directors of BCCI and Banco Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL), the Italian bank involved in illegally financing arms sales to Iraq. Interestingly, Hartmann also served on the board of a New York bank, Intermaritime, owned by none other than Bruce Rappaport, a Swiss/Israeli businessman who was a frequent companion of CIA Director William Casey. In 1986, Casey used Rappaport to control the $10 million the Sultan of Brunei gave “Mr. Kenilworth” (Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abram’s pseudonym) for the Contras. The funds were then supposedly “lost,” before re-discovery during the Iran-Contra affair.
The remarkably well-connected Mr. Hartmann helped arrange the sale of BCP to a Turkish bank, Cukarova, at a speed which all but ruled out due diligence. Cukarova owned a company called “Enda,” which in turn owned a company called “EnTrade,” a New York-based trading company, which in turn handled financial transactions for the arming of Iraq by employees of none other than BNL- Hartmann’s other board of directorship. What other bank was found to have been involved with BNL in the U.S. in funding Iraqi arms transactions? BCCI.
One issue faced by Robert Gates in his confirmation hearings in the Fall of 1991 was the degree to which officials of the U.S. intelligence community may have assisted Iraq with dual-use technology and other help in its war against Iran. Accordingly, the BCCI-BNL-BCP connection becomes one more oddity leading back to the underlying issue of just what and how extensive was the BCCI connection to the CIA.
Kerr told the high school students that the CIA was conducting surveillance and gathering intelligence through BCCI. He neglected to tell them on whom, to what end, and with what result. Kerr and the CIA still have not answered some troubling questions: Did that surveillance reveal weapons sales to Iraqi entities within the United States? Was BCCI’s involvement with Iraqi a sales and the BNL affair another part of a Casey-inspired off-the-books operation?
Other important and as yet unanswered questions arise regarding the use of BCCI by China, Pakistan, and South Africa for weapons sales and purchases or sales of dangerous technologies; and additionally by Pakistan and South Africa to funnel U.S. funds to the Mujahedeen. Further investigation is also needed into BCCI’s pervasive involvement with laundering funds for the various business enterprises of former CIA asset Manuel Noriega.
Jun 05, 2012 · A Washington Post Notable Nonfiction Book for 2011 One of The Economist’s 2011 Books of the Year . In Reckless Endangerment, Gretchen Morgenson exposes how the watchdogs who were supposed to protect the country from financial harm were actually complicit in the actions that finally blew up the American economy.Drawing on previously untapped sources and building on original …
Oct 27, 2010 · Ms. MORGENSON: When they‘re originated, the banks want to get rid of the mortgages so that they can make another loan. How the machinery worked during the …
Mar 23, 2012 · Gretchen Morgenson has earned a Pulitzer-winning career from exposing abuse and conflicts of interest on Wall Street. In this interview, she confirms that there is indeed a second set of rules …
Jun 25, 2017 · The New York Times’ Gretchen Morgenson has a rather odd piece on last week’s failure of Banco Popular in Spain. The bank was swiftly taken over by Santander to put it out of its misery, the…
May 13, 2020 · By Gretchen Morgenson and Emmanuelle … “One of the objectives is to point out any deficiencies in the system that may harm the patient,” Lin told NBC News. … which bought …
10 hours ago – Deutsche Bank eagerly took on clients dumped by JP Morgan Chase. Now it’s … and ordering it to clean up its anti-money laundering controls.
Predatory Mortgages Predatory Foreclosures THE MONEY LAUNDRY SEE The Dirty Dirty Illegal Mortgages and Money Laundering of The Deutsche Bank / JP …You’ve visited this page many times. Last visit: 6/10/20
Jun 28, 2019 – EXPOSED https://youtu.be/KWWjpYEHXlk Money laundering is the processing of … JP Morgan Chase – Deutsche Bank THE PREDATORS | …You’ve visited this page many times. Last visit: 5/15/20
Apr 3, 2019 – money laundering programs. Currently, real estate agents are not covered by the Bank Secrecy Act and are not required to file suspicious …
Jan 23, 2019 – Money laundering is something that global banks operating in the U.S. … for Deutsche Bank or the big Wall Street banks like JPMorgan Chase, …
Deutsche Bank THE Mortgages and the Laundry – Law for the … … CROOKED BANKSTERS are GOING DOWN Trillions Looted Bank Fraud Real Estate Swindle … Congress Subpoenas Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup …
Feb 24, 2020 – The bank has admitted publicly to failing to tackle money laundering … banks accounts at JPMorgan Chase Bank, Bank of New York Mellon, …
Money laundering is the illegal process of concealing the origins of money obtained illegally by passing it through a complex sequence of banking transfers or commercial transactions. The overall scheme of this process returns the money to the launderer in an obscure and indirect way.
EPSTEINS’S PALS ARE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THIS ICEBERG … Orgy Island and NXIVM ( J. Epstein & Company ) The WHITEWASH
Oh Look Many MONTHS after We Blew the Whistle in Bankruptcy and US District Court in Tennessee About this website CBSNEWS.COM How the Danske Bank money-laundering scheme involving $230 billion unraveled It could be the biggest money-laundering scheme in history, with suspicious money flowing from Russia and former Soviet republics
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal …… Create a book · Download as PDF · Printable version … is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. Such activity may include illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, money laundering, counterfeiting, embezzlement, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other unsavory business practices.
Jul 28, 2019 – The U.S. government introduced the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act in October 1970 to contain racketeering. Through RICO, prosecutors can charge a person if they have committed at least two acts of racketeering within a 10-year period.
Dec 7, 2017 – In a criminal RICO case, the racketeering activities must be shown to be related. … Penalties for RICO convictions are substantial and include imprisonment, criminal forfeiture, plus fines as high as twice the gross profits or proceeds of the RICO offense.
SwampFox
10:17 AM (1 minute ago)
to FSCDemsPress, bpold.frankfurt, cam, FRC, AskDOJ, FSCDems, Esq., Donald, Jacqueline
THE ORIGINAL WHISTLE BLOWERWEB.ARCHIVE.ORG Restoring The Bill of Rights One Website at a Time (May 26, 2000) I believe that very shortly I will be setup AGAIN on more Red Herring FALSE Charges by Local and Probably Federal…
The Real Estate Backed Mortgage Securities Frauds against the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, The Pension Funds and other Private Investment groups ALL relied upon the SUCKERING of the Subprime Borrower. NONE Of the massive defrauding of the Investors or US Government was possible WITHOUT Baiting, Luring and Exploitation of the consumers. The suckers of the Rackets were an integral part of the greater plan to perpetrate the RBM and SECURITIZATION RACKETEERING …. JBW ( Same with the Foreclosures Swindles )
Apr 1, 2012 – Simply put, money laundering entails taking criminal profits and moving them in a prohibited manner. Specifically, criminals or persons acting on their behalf generate proceeds in the form of money or property as a result of committing a crime designated as a specified unlawful activity (SUA).
Any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds … In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and … the property was lawfully seized by a State or local law enforcement agency and …
Civil forfeiture in the United States, also called civil asset forfeiture or civil judicial forfeiture or …. Police seized vehicles and equipment and cash and other property from … Illegal drugs are a big business; one estimate was that the annual profit from … Civil forfeiture has been used to discourage illegal activities such as …
Asset forfeiture or asset seizure is a form of confiscation of assets by the state. In the United States, it is a type of criminal justice financial obligation. It typically applies to the alleged proceeds or instruments of crime. This applies, but is not limited, to terrorist activities, drug related crimes, and … Acquired from the results of unlawful activity; Is likely to be …
Explanation: Sections 1956 and 1957 both require that the property involved in the money laundering transaction be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity …
Sep 16, 2013 – the tools available to investigators to identify, seize, and ultimately …. Simply put, money laundering is the act of taking criminal proceeds … proceeds and the actor must know that the funds are derived from unlawful activity. Id.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law … in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity), section …. authorized by this section, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds … to the United States and shall also authorize the Attorney General to seize all …
Churning is the process of making multiple transfers of funds in order to make the analysis of bank accounts by an investigator more difficult. When a person is engaged in money laundering, dirty money is initially recorded in a bank account. Once a sufficient amount of cash has been accumulated, it is broken up and wired to multiple other accounts, typically in foreign locations, where the amounts are again split up and wired to other bank accounts. This constant reshuffling process obscures the origin of the cash.
The churning concept can also apply to the excessive buying and selling of client-owned securities by a broker in order to earn commissions. This situation can only arise when a broker has discretionary authority over a client’s account.
The Object of the Racketeering is to transform the DIRTY MONEY into a Clean Real Estate Asset ( The Foreclosure )
The conversion or transfer of property, the concealment or disguising of the nature of the proceeds, the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing that these are derived from criminal activity and participate or assist the movement of funds to make the proceeds appear legitimate, is money laundering.
Jun 19, 2019 – The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation is examining whether Deutsche Bankcomplied with laws meant to stop money laundering, a person …
Jun 19, 2019 – Topline: Germany’s embattled Deutsche Bank is reportedly under … for failing to comply with regulations meant to stop money laundering, the …
Apr 7, 2019 – Another week. Another Deutsche Bank scandal. Regulators and legislators globally need to recognize that Deutsche Bank’s recidivism is an …
Jun 6, 2019 – Last month, the New York Times reported that anti-money-laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank had flagged “suspicious activity” on the …
Jan 31, 2017 – The big fines keep coming for Deutsche Bank. The giant German lender was hit with about $630 million in penalties on Tuesday over a $10 …
Jun 19, 2019 – The FBI is reportedly investigating Deutsche Bank over money-launderingregulation compliance, including transactions connected to Jared …
AS DEUTSCHE IS RAIDED AND LOOTED , CRASHES AND BURNS
The Justice Department sued Deutsche Bank AG, one of the world’s 10 biggest banks by assets, on Tuesday for at least $1 billion for defrauding taxpayers by “repeatedly” lying to a federal agency when securing taxpayer-backed insurance for thousands of shoddy mortgages. ( perpetrated by lying “AKA” Liars Loans )
Pickard was a senior loan officer at JP Morgan Chase Bank.
Between January 2006 and July 2007, Pickard conspired with others to defraud the bank by completing, certifying, and submitting mortgage loan applications on behalf of borrowers that contained false and fraudulent statements.
According to the plea agreement, Pickard, and others, submitted loan applications to Chase on behalf of buyers who had good credit scores to buy residential real property in Sarasota, Orlando, Bradenton and Clearwater, Florida, for investment purposes.
But Pickard and others knowingly made false and fraudulent statements, representations and promises, willfully concealed the truth about the borrowers in question, including:
So the Bastards are SERIAL BULL SHIT ARTISTS HOUSINGWIRE.COM
It’s official: Deutsche Bank reaches $7.2 billion RMBS settlement Late last year, Deutsche Bank announced that it reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the Department of Justice in connection with the bank’s issuance and underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities between 2005 and 2007. Although the bank made the announcement in late December, the se…
Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Bank Et Al ) Intervention of Right
and )
Intervenor )
RESEARCH TEAM ) OBEY THE RULES
Judson Witham )
Private Attorney General )
Obey the Rules
DEMAND for Production of Discovery
REPUDIATION of Unlawful Mortgage Contracts
DEFAULT STATUS of ALL DEFENDANTS
The Predatory Fraudulent Mortgages
The Deutsche Bank’s MARATHON INTERNATIONAL
Violations of the Rules Witham’s Imtervention of Right
Dear Judge Corker , Judge Jordan, Judge McLennan,
Obey THE RULE
Rule 24. Intervention
(a) Intervention of Right. On timely motion, the court must permit anyone to intervene who:
is given an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute; or
claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movant’s ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequately represent that interest. (b) Permissive Intervention.
In General. On timely motion, the court may permit anyone to intervene who:
is given a conditional right to intervene by a federal statute; or
has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.
By a Government Officer or Agency. On timely motion, the court may permit a federal or state governmental officer or agency to intervene if a party’s claim or defense is based on:
a statute or executive order administered by the officer or agency; or
any regulation, order, requirement, or agreement issued or made under the statute or executive order.
Delay or Prejudice. In exercising its discretion, the court must consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties’ rights.
(c) Notice and Pleading Required. A motion to intervene must be served on the parties as provided in Rule 5. The motion must state the grounds for intervention and be accompanied by a pleading that sets out the claim or defense for which intervention is sought.
II
Qui Tam / Private Attorney General / Next of Friend
Deutsche Bank is the World’s most prolific purveyor of FRAUDULENT Real estate Backed Mortgage Securities in Human History.
The VAST MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACIES the above BANKSTERS have been caught Red Handed in are the Focus of Judson Witham’s QUI TAM / Whistleblowing to the US Senate Banking Committee, US Congress Financial Services Committee, The FhFA, The HUD, The FBI and the DOJ.
As Qui Tam Whistleblower Judson Witham has shown that the MORTGAGE BUSINESSES of ALL THE DEFENDANTS In the Present Case were FINANCED, FUNDED and MONETIZED using the Vast Amounts of Financial Resources UNLAWFULLY OBTAINED from US Government and Quasi Government Lending Agencies AND Private Pensions, Equity Funds and Wall Street etc etc et al INVESTOR GROUPS …. Publicly Insured and which have cost the United States Taxpayers UNTOLD TRILLIONS in Reserve Notes.
In the instant case, The Outcome of the Birchfield Case involves the proper Investigation, PRODUCTION of these Defendants Financial Records and the Facts associated with the NEXUS OF ACTIONS AND FACTS that reveal the Money Laundering and Vast Frauds against the US Government et Al are INTRINSICALLY ENTWINED and Funded, Financed, Monetized and Enabled by the VAST and Highly Illegal Profiteering in INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING.
The “ RESEARCH TEAM “ as it is known JUDSON WITHAM has an extensive public record of BLOWING THE WHISTLE on the Savings and Loans and Banks starting in the early 1980s that continues into this Case.
The “ RESEARCH TEAM “ has exposed to the World that the Money Laundering and Fraudulent Mortgage Activities and Mortgage Securitizations with the PREDICATE ACTS OF MONEY LAUNDERING are all intrinsically entwined and made possible ONLY BY THE UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES set out and defined in the BIRCHFIELD CASE.
The RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham has directly exposed the DIRECT CONNECTIONS of the Mortgage Frauds and Money Laundering to the US House Financial Services Committee, The House Intelligence Committee, The US Senate Banking Committee, SEC, OCC, HUD, FHA, FhFA, FinCen, DOJ and FBI among others in International Media. The Outcome of the Birchfield Case directly impacts the PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL / QUI TAM and WHISTLEBLOWER Actions of the RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham.
In the present Case the Birchfield Matter, OBEYING THE RULES regarding Notice Pleading as is THE RULE set out in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 is a Matter of CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to the RESEARCH TEAM , Intervenor Judson Witham.
The LAWFUL Application of THE RULES and OBEYING Them as it effects Equal Protection and Due Process of the Law DIRECTLY effects THE RESEARCH TEAM, Judson Witham’s Constitutional and Civil Rights as well as His Private Attorney General, Qui Tam Whistleblowing to Due Process and Equal Protection of the Laws.
The WORLD FAMOUS Bank Frauds, Lootings, Money Laundering and other Violations of the Law in the BIRCHFIELD CASE effect the RESEARCH TEAM , Judson Witham Directly as the LAST FOUR DECADES of Banking Debacles, Savings and Loan Scandals, BAIL OUTS and ECONOMIC Collapses have DIRECTLY Caused Monetary Damages to the RESEARCH TEAM and Judson Witahm and His Family.
The INFAMOUS Financial Crimes of the 1980s and 1990s EMINATING from Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin Texas ( THE STATE OF TEXAS ) were exposed to the SENATE, CONGRESS, DOJ, FBI and US Secret Service by JUDSON WITHAM …. THE RESEARCH TEAM. The Records of the FBI, US Justice Department, and the Federal and State Courts in Harris and Montgomery County Texas reveal that THE RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham exposed to the World the REAL ESTATE SWINDLES, THE REAL ESTATE SCAMS directly traceable to HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS in Banking, Savings and Loans and US Government Lending Agencies and INSURANCE FUNDS of the FDIC and FSLIC There are COUNTLESS WITNESSES including US District Judge Lynn Hughes, US Judge Lee Rosenthal, US Secret Service Agent RICK WILLIAMS, The Houston Chronicle, Former US Prosecutor PROFESSOR WILLIAM K. BLACK , The Conroe Courier, Houston POST and virtually every TELEVISION NEWS STATION in Texas being witness.
OBEYING THE RULES ….. It seems that Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Select Portfolio Services “ THE NAMED DEFENDANTS “ and a HOARD of Yet to be NAMED OTHERS …. Have certainly been engaged in VAST Mortgage and Banking Frauds as well as GARGANTUAN Money Laundering Activities ….. Costing US Taxpayers and Investors TRILLIONS in Losses. The Money Laudering of Deutsche Bank and these other Defendants being the PRINCIPLE PERPETRATORS of these UNLAWFUL Racketeering Activities. The FRCP 8 and FRCP 9 Pleading Standards and the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY and having THE RULES OBEYED and the RULES Properly Enforced and Applied directly effect THE RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham et al to SECURE Due Process and Equal Protection of the Constitution and Laws. INTERVENTION OF RIGHT in this matter are ALLOWED for Private Attorney Generals and INTERVENORS of Right such as Judson Witham
THE FINANCIAL CRIME SPREE and the MONEY LAUNDERING, Bank Frauds and Looting of the US Financial System is ALL Intrinsically Entwined with the MONEY LAUNDERING RACKETEERING and CONSPIRACIES being alleged in the BIRCHFIELD CASE.
The PROPER TREATMENT of FRCP 8 and FRCP 9 directly effects Judson Witham the RESEARCH TEAM.
The Production of the JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Banks, Select Portfolio Services INTERNAL RECORDS, FILES, COMPUTER DATA and Access to Their Internal SARS reports and SARS Investigations records MUST BE Ordered by the Judge Leon Jordan and Magistrate Clifton L. Corker. MANDATORY DISCLOSURES and AMPLE DISCOVERY is a Protected Constitutional Right to Jacqueline Birchfield . The RESEARCH TEAM , Judson Witham and to ALL THE VICTIMS that have been DEFRAUDED and SWINDLED by the Defendants in this Case. TRILLIONS HAVE BEEN SWINDLED from the American People and the World ….. Said Financial Crime Spree has directly damaged Ms. Birchfield and RESEARCH / TEAM Judson Witham and a Multitude of MILLIONS of American Families and People around the World.
III.
The QUI TAM LAWS / PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTIONS
Rights of PRIVATE ACTIONS of Next of Friends and Pro Se Parties
Intervention as of RIGHT is allowed by FRCP 24. Private Citizens as well as Next of Friends and Pro Se’s have CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to Blow the Whistle and Bring Qui Tam Actions as well as seek Lawful and Constitutional Due Process of Law as NON LAWYERS.
The Birchfield Case Facts and Law are IDENTICAL to the matters THE RESEARCH TEAM / JUDSON WITHAM has reported, brought to the attention of and Tipped the United States Government AND THIS COURT ABOUT. The MONEY LAUNDERING and MORTGAGE FRAUDS, Predatory Lending, Foreclosure Frauds, Predatory Foreclosure and using Foreclosure and Predatory Loans to ENABLE and PERPETRATE Mortgage Fraud and Money Laundering are all FUNDED and FINANCED, Monetized by the Mortgage Frauds and Money Laundering.
Going back to the 1980s in Houston Texas and across Texas and Across the United States the FINANCIAL CRIMES and FRAUDS have been PARASITIZING the National Economic Health …. Costing US Taxpayers UNTOLD TRILLIONS and has directly Financially Damaged Plaintiff Birchfield and Intervenor Witham etc etc Et Al. OBEY THE RULES certainly needs to be imposed on Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase and Credit Suisse / Select Portfolio Services in the INSTANT CASE. Yes They Must OBEY THE RULES.
4 The Immense Correlation between Human Trafficking, Narcotics Trafficking, Terrorism, Weapons Trafficking and every other Nature of Criminal Activities for PROFIT can be Traced to the MONEY LAUNDERING and BANKING FRAUDS of the Defendants in the Instant Case. THE RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham has a Direct Interest in the Outcome of the Birchfield Case. FRCP 8 and FRCP 9 …. The Right to DISCOVERY, The Right to Due Process and Equal Protection of the Laws, the RIGHT to Bring Qui Tam Actions, Whistle Blow AND MOST IMPORTANTLY The RIGHT TO HAVE JURIES Decide Cases and Jury Trials directly effect RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham and Ms. Birchfield. IN FACT the Proper Due Process and Equal Protection Issues in THE INSTANT CASE effects ALL Americans and without ANY QUESTION Directly Effects YOUR INTERVENOR WITHAM. The Crime Spree of THE DEFENDANTS in this Case are Directly Financed by the ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and MONEY LAUNDERING as described by Witham, The Research Team and Ms. Birchfield Etc Et Al.
Nov 29, 2018 · German police raided Deutsche Bank offices on Thursday, seeking evidence in a money laundering investigation into the practice of hiding money …
Jun 20, 2019 · FRANKFURT: The US Federal Bureau of Investigation is examining whether Deutsche Bank complied with laws meant to stop money laundering, a person with knowledge of the matter said on Thursday. The … Author: Reuters
days ago · FBI eyes Deutsche Bank after money-laundering report. By: The Associated Press June 20, 2019 The FBI has reached out to a lawyer for a former Deutsche Bank employee who complained that the bank …
days ago Deutsche Bank faces FBI investigation for possible money-laundering lapses: Source The transactions were notable because they were linked to companies controlled by U.S.
President Donald Trump and his son-in-law and advisor Jared Kushner. ● Author: Reuters
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/banks-have-been-fined-a-staggering-243-billion-since… Feb 24, 2018 · According to Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, which compiled the list, Bank of America BAC, +0.42% leads the ignominious tally with $76 billion in fines. JPMorgan Chase JPM, -0.13% has been fined nearly $44 billion, and a number of other big money-center banks have been fined over $10 billion. Thirteen banks make up 93% of the total.
8 days ago · 2 of 2 FILE – In this Oct. 7, 2016, file photo a flag for Deutsche Bank flies outside the German bank’s New York offices on Wall Street. The FBI has reached out to a lawyer for a former Deutsche …
8 days ago · NEW YORK (AP) — The FBI has reached out to a lawyer for a former Deutsche Bankemployee who complained that the bank was ignoring suspicious transactions, including some involving Jared Kushner’s family real estate company. The former Deutsche Bank anti-money launderingspecialist, Tammy …
8 days ago · FBI eyes Deutsche Bank after money-laundering report. 1 / 3. Back to Gallery NEW YORK (AP) — The FBI has reached out to a lawyer for a former Deutsche Bank employee who complained that the bank …
Nov 29, 2018 · Police raided six Deutsche Bank offices in and around Frankfurt on Thursday over money laundering allegations linked to the “Panama Papers”, the public prosecutor’s office in Germany’s financial …
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/business/jpmorgan-money-laundering.htmlDec 21, 2017 · JPMorgan ‘Seriously Breached’ Money-Laundering Rules, Swiss Regulator SaysJPMorgan ‘Seriously Breached’ Money-Laundering Rules, Swiss Regulator Says. The bank had to overhaul its anti-money laundering practices as part of an inquiry into whether lapses in its internal controls had allowed Bernard L. Madoff to keep a $50 billion Ponzi scheme going. JPMorgan paid the Justice Department …
Jan 31, 2017 · Deutsche Bank fined $630m over Russia money laundering claims This article is more than 2 years old. … Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse agree multi-billion-dollar settlements with US.
“Lax money-laundering controls, market rigging, selling toxic securities—Germany’s Deutsche Bank has been investigated for all of these practices since the 2008 financial crisis, running up $18.3 billion in fines and legal costs, more than any other European bank.
Jan 31, 2017 · The big fines keep coming for Deutsche Bank. The giant German lender was hit with about $630 million in penalties on Tuesday over a $10 billion Russian money-laundering scheme that …
May 31, 2017 · Deutsche Bank AG agreed to pay $41 million to settle Federal Reserve allegations that its U.S. operations failed to maintain adequate protections against money laundering, the latest in a …
Author: Jesse Hamilton, Steven Arons
In the Court’s ORDER DENYING the Plaintiff’s Motion for Default …. It is AMAZING how Select Portfolio Services ABSENCE throughout the Case is GLOSSED OVER ? Obey the Rules ?
The MULTIPLE Falsehoods associated with the HUD 1 Statements and RESPA Disclosures associated with the Birchfield “ VOID CONTRACTS “ reveals The Premier Mortgage Funding and JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank MUST ALSO Obey the Rules.
1051 Premier Mortgage Funding Offices in ALL 50 States with more than 7,000 Unscrupulous Mortgage Agents …. FHA / HUD and FHFA Terminated Them for Deceptive, Fraudulent and Unlawful Lending Practices …. Obey the Rules ?
Precisely WHEN did Select Portfolio Services enter any 12 b6 or Rule 56 Motions to Dismiss ?
Plausible Inferences FRCP 8 and FRCP 9 ….. As can be ABUNDANTLY seen throughout this case …. The Jury Trial Demanded is certainly PROPER and Certainly a Constitutional Right when the PROPER RULES are OBEYED …. In this case Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan Chase and YES even Select Portfolio Services have paid Millions upon Millions even BILLIONS for Unlawful Predatory Mortgage Practices and MONEY LAUNDERING. Across Planet Earth there are MILLIONS of Witnesses and Many thousands of Law Enforcement Officials GERMANE and MATERIAL Witnesses to these FACTS. Obey the Rules ?
The CUGNO MORTGAGE FUNDING with DEUTSCHE BANK , JP Morgan Chase Bank, Select Portfolio etc. Et Al, engaged in UNLAWFUL and UNALLOYED falsification of the disbursement of the ESCROW ACCOUNTS associated with the Jacqueline Birchfield Loans ….. LOANS … the ILLEGAL FRAUDULENT Mortgages and Escrow / Title Services / Loan Servicing at the heart of these CASES 2:19-CV-005 and Case No. C15841. The Transactions born in FRAUD and Connected to the MOTHER LOAD of Frauds that have been perpetrated in Tennessee and Across the United States and AROUND THE WORLD.
In that Deutsche Bank’s and JP Morgan Chase Bank’s LAWYERS have refused to ANSWER the Original Pleadings, Seem to think IGNORING the Summons and Complaint in this case is TACTICAL …. I would suggest THE DISCOVERY THEY ARE AVOIDING is way way way OVERDUE
OBEY THE RULES ?
JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank with the CUGNO MAFIA certainly have an ENORMOUS and NOTORIOUS record with FBI, DOJ, SEC, OCC, SEC, FHA, HUD and German and International Police for MORTGAGE FRAUDS and MONEY LAUNDERING. Many BILLIONS paid in Penalties and Fines and even a CONSENT DECREE OR TWO.
It is time for the FULL Production of the ESCROW FILES, APPRAISAL RECORDS and Yes of Course the RESPA Title X …. HUD 1 Disbursement Records to be produced. These DEFENDANTS are miserably LATE and REFUSING to Produce Discovery.
FRAUD employed to secure a Consumers Participation in any CONTRACT creates a VOID AB INITIO Worthless The VOID Predatory Mortgage Frauds of these Defendants is well known around the World. OBEY THE RULES ?
In closing the ENORMOUS Mortgage Frauds of these Defendants bear directly on the Invalidity and VOID status of the UNLAWFUL Escrow and Credit / Mortgage Transaction herein in Case 2:19-CV-005 The BIRCHFIELD LOANS ( Plural )
The HUD and FHA, FBI and HUD with SEC, OCC and German Police, the US Senate and US Congress are ALL Noticed regarding the VAST Mortgage Frauds that the CUGNO Mafia and Deutsche Bank / JP Morgan and Select Portfolio have perpetrated NOT JUST all over Tennessee but ALL OVER AMERICA
Nelson and Mullins and Baker and Donelson are herein NOTICED and the Complete Contents of Their Clients and Their Records and Files Germane to these Matters are DEMANDED in Discovery. These Defendants FRAUDULENT MORTGAGE ACTIVITIES are Notorious around the World. Huge numbers of People being DEFRAUDED. Those Records which appertain to this Case and ALL the Others are DEMANDED …… Enough is Enough PRODUCE Your Answers all Your Records and YOU ARE IN DEFAULT … Open ALL the Records and Files OBEY THERULES.
Plaintiff and Your Intervenor in this Cause of Action Demand FULL AND ROBUST DISCOVERY TO BE ORDERED and AFTER a JURY TRIAL after Production of Records, Subpoenas, Depositions and Interrogatories are Fully and Properly Answered. Plaintiff DEMANDS a Jury Trial on account of the UNLAWFUL and VOID Mortgage AGreements and Racketeering Scheme that Select Portfolio Services, Premier, Paramount and Pioneer Mortgage Funding MOBSTERS along with JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank …. AND THEIR LAWYERS are perpetrating. YES OF COURSE …. Defendants and Their Lawyers should ALSO OBEY THE RULES
IV
DEUTSCHE BANK, JP MORGAN CHASE, CREDIT SUISSE, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICES are required to and must be made to OBEY THE RULES
Wherefore Premises Considered as a Matter of Right as allowed by FRCP
24 The RESEARCH TEAM / Judson Witham
herein DEMAND to Intervene and to See to it that FULL AND ROBUST MANDATORY DISCLOSURES and DISCOVERY are
Ordered in the Birchfield Case.
Intervenor
DEMANDs the Proper Application of FRCP 8
and FRCP 9
Intervenor
Demands that the Right to JURY TRIALS, Due Process and Equal Protection of the
Laws be Protected.
Intervenor
Demands a Full Accounting of the Financial Crimes and Civil Frauds that the
Defendants Have Been Committed and that a MINIMUM Financial Reward be Paid to Ms. Birchfield, The Research Team and Judson
Witham be ordered by this Court for NO LESS THAN 100 Million Reserve Notes.
Intervenor
Demands that a PUNITIVE AWARD in the Amount of 15% of the Worth of the Defendant Corporations Be Paid
to Witham/ Research Team and Ms.
Birchfield in this Whistle Blower, Qui Tam and
Mortgage / Foreclosure …..
MONEY LAUNDERING CASE.
Intervenor
Demands Proper Due Process and Equal Protection of the Laws under the RICO
Statutes, Common Law and Statutory Fraud
Laws as well as the Consumer Protection
and
Constitutional Laws of the State of Tennessee and of the United
States. INTERVENOR has Direct Papable
and INALIENABLE RIGHTS to Due Process and Equal Protection of the Laws and to
DEFEND and PROTECT the Right to TRIAL BY JURY.
Intervenor
DEMANDS that Mortgage Frauds and Illegal Contracts, Predatory Mortgages, Predatory Foreclosures
and the MONEY LAUNDERING and Financial Frauds which have cost
American Taxpayers MANY MANY TRILLIONS result in THESE
DEFENDANTS ….. OBEYING THE
RULES and FULLY being DISGORGED of Their Illgotten Gains and the BAIL OUTS and
STOLEN FUNDS of which Their CRIME SPREE has Cost the American Taxpayers
and Your Intervenor, Qui Tam, Whistle
Blower and Ms. Birchfield.
INTERVENOR HEREIN ASSERTS IS
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO INTERVENE AS OF RIGHT and as well to Be Allowed
to Permissibly Intervene
(B) has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common
question of law or fact. … The motion must state the grounds for intervention and be accompanied by a
pleading that sets out the claim or defense for which intervention is sought.
As Whistleblower acting in Qui Tam …. Witham has shown to
the FBI, DOJ, SEC, OCC, FinCen, FhFA, FHA, HUD, the Senate and Congress and the
Courts of the United States that the
MONEY LAUNDERING and PROFITS from Predatory Foreclosures, Laundering
Money with Real Estate and Laundering Money through
Predatory and UNLAWFUL
Mortgage Practices has cost US Taxpayers on a VAST
SCALE. Intervenor has a
Property Interest in the
RECOVERY of UNTOLD Trillions as Quai Tam and Whistle
Blower ….. In same, Similar and Exact Fashion as Ms. Birchfield has Rights to recover Her
Damages.
The Senate, Congress, Whte House Office of the US
President and US Secret Service with the
Judiciary of the United States has been shown the DIRECT FUNDING of these Defendants Frauds and
Crimes, Illegal Profiteering by The Research Team, Ms.
Birchfield and Intervenor Judson Witham. RULE 24 Abundantly Applies and MUST BE
Observed and Enforced .
These Defendants MUST BE MADE to OBEY THE RULES
RESEARCH TEAM
Respectfully Submitted,
/S/ Judson Witham
Judson Witham
Certificate
of Service
On this the 28th Day of
June 2019 Jacqueline Birchfield, The Law Firm of Baker and Donelson. Nelson and
Mullins Attorney Aldridge Pite Attorney of record for Aldridge Pite is Greg
Wallach And Paul E. McLemore have by Email and US Mail been served this
Opposition to the Motion herein at:
GeraldCugnoDeutsche Bank JPMorganChaseCredit Suisse The Largest Financial SWINDLES and CRIMES in History IT’s A GLOBAL CRIME SCENE Funded in VERY LARGE PART by Laundered MoneyGAME OVER – toxiczombiedevelopments.wordpress.comtoxiczombiedevelopments.wordpress.com/234-2/Is this answer helpful?
GAME OVER – toxiczombiedevelopments.wordpress.comhttps://toxiczombiedevelopments.wordpress.com/234-2Dear FHFA,, FinCen, HUD, FHA and DOJ / FBI Etc Et Al, Gerald Cugno of Tampa Florida ( New Jersey ) AKA Premier, Paramount and Pioneer MORTGAGE BROKERS had all 900 Offices Shutter because of MortgageFraud Practices and JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse and Select Portfolio Services have paid UNTOLD BILLIONS in Fines and Penalties …
Welcome | Home Lending | Chase.comhttps://http://www.chase.com/personal/mortgageChase has mortgage options to purchase a new home or to refinance an existing one. Our home equity line of credit lets you use a home’s equity to pay for home improvements or other expenses. Get started online or with a Chase Home Lending Advisor .
Polish immigrant Steve Szladewski’s ruddy complexion grows redder as he rattles off the sales pitch that led him to buy property in the Shepard’s Landing subdivision in Montgomery County.
Former astronaut Alan Shepard, the subdivision’s developer with former Houston Mayor Louie Welch, was to be his next-door neighbor, a salesman bragged. Szladewski’s land, though bordering the San Jacinto River, was unlikely to flood. And the horseshoe-shaped road winding through the subdivision would be paved.
“Alan Shepard didn’t move next door. A guy from New Jersey bought that lot,” said Szladewski, a small, gray-bearded man who struggles with his English.
The road also failed to materialize, and on one occasion, Szladewski anchored his tiny clapboard house to two large oak trees to save it from being swept away by the rain-swollen river.
“In Poland, I learn people in America help each other. But in America, I learn sometimes they say things so you buy.” Szladewski is not alone. Shepard’s Landing, developed in Montgomery County’s real estate boom of the late 1960s through early 1980s, is one of hundreds of problem-plagued subdivisions that have come back to haunt the county and its residents during the bust.
They are speckled throughout the county’s dense pine forests, the legacy of a ripe economy gone sour. In many instances, they are the handiwork of unscrupulous developers who skirted the county’s rules to make a fast buck.
Some developers, however, say the county is to blame for encouraging development without spelling out or enforcing any restrictions.
Some of the subdivisions have plats recorded with the county as required by state law. Others – about 600 – are unrecorded or “red flag” subdivisions that do not meet county road and drainage standards and have no plats, or plans, filed.
All of them hold disgruntled, heartbroken homeowners with similar stories:
When Mike and Pam Jordan purchased five acres of land in The Wilderness subdivision off FM 1488 for $21,000, they were told there would be no problem in getting basic services such as electricity to their wooded lot.
“But we found out it really was the wilderness,” said Jordan. The only access to their trailer home is a narrow, muddy gas pipeline easement. No electrical easement to his property exists. The couple lived by a gas lantern for several months and had to pay $2,000 to run a wire through the woods and hook up with an electrical line. Their utility bills run double as a result.
In the recorded Park Place mobile home subdivision near Magnolia, the streets are named after those in the popular board game, Monopoly. But the similarity stops there, says resident Pat Wuensche, whose back yard on West Boardwalk is mushy with sewage.
Thirty families have joined the Texas attorney general in suing the developer, claiming he falsely represented that septic tanks would work in the subdivision’s soil.
Wuensche said she is still waiting for the 24-hour security, recreational facilities and county-standard roads she was promised.
In the Indian Hills subdivision off 2978, Richard and Mary Blunk were shown a developer’s plat of the subdivision, reflecting a nice chunk of property on which they later built a home. They later discovered that the subdivision’s road cut through an area reflected on the map as their property.
Residents in some problem subdivisions are denied basic services such as mail delivery because of roads that turn into slick obstacle courses at the first rain. School bus drivers refuse to travel them. Fire and ambulance personnel live in fear of the day someone dies because an emergency vehicle cannot clear the mud and potholes.
Realtors won’t waste their time listing such properties. Hardly a Commissioners Court session goes by where residents don’t plead for help from the county. The county has decided to go to the courts.
“In the past, I think developers thought `what’s the county going to do? They don’t have the stuff to come after me,”‘ said County Engineer Don Blanton. “I think they realize the county means business now.”
Last year, the county hired attorney Nelda Radabaugh to address the problem and force developers to comply with the subdivision requirements. She has sent numerous warning letters to developers asking them to upgrade their roads and drainage systems and has filed a lawsuit against one developer, S. E. Rutledge, of the Southern Pines subdivision off FM 1314.
In the past, county officials bowed to public pressure, maintaining the substandard roads to please constituents and gain votes.
But a downturned economy, tighter road and bridge budgets and a need to properly address what’s become a monumental problem has all but precluded that practice, say county officials.
Radabaugh said most developers the county has contacted are cooperative. “But some of them are bankrupt, gone to Timbuktu, Kansas, hiding.
“We don’t base our investigation on which residents are screaming the loudest. It has to be on which subdivisions are the worst. It’s not easy explaining to someone `Yes, your subdivision is bad. But you’re number 400 on the list.”‘
Jack and Ernestine Daniel, residents of the Southern Pines development, hope the county’s efforts will pay off.
They joke that they own lakefront property. The subdivision has no drainage ditches. When it rains, the water puddles up in chug holes, some nearly as wide as the road itself. Water moccasins sunbathe on the road after the water recedes.
Mrs. Daniel has named the subdivision’s narrow, dirt roads herself: Rub Board Road, Slip ‘N Slide Drive and Dip ‘N Dive Drive.
“It about says it all.”
To hammer her point home, she sent notices to the developers, inviting them to “The super slide and roller coaster ride in Southern Pines.” The letter continues “bring your bulldozer, dump truck, backhoe or grade as the pot holes and mud holes are at least three to four feet deep. Use of an ordinary car will destroy your tires, shocks and springs and put bruises on your skull.”
A postscript reads, “The next invitation will not be as cordial.”
“Our children have been embarrassed to bring friends home,” Mrs. Daniel said. “The head coach at Sam Houston State came out here once to talk to our son. He said he never had to come down such deplorable roads in his life to recruit a boy.”
Polish immigrant Szladewski hopes the county’s efforts will benefit him as well.
His property in the unrecorded Shepard’s Landing subdivision off FM 2854 is not only in the flood plain, it’s in the river bed. County officials have told him his home would have to be built 21 feet off the ground to be above the 100-year flood plain.
Shepard, Welch and businessman Jack Coogan initiated the project. A now-defunct Conroe real estate brokerage company sold the lots.
The county filed misdemeanor charges against the three investors in 1980, claiming the subdivision was falsely represented as county approved. The investor’s attorney, Dan McCrary, said the charges were without merit and were dropped on condition that certain things be upgraded at the development. None were.
McCrary said purchasers in Shepard’s Landing signed letters acknowledging the land was in the flood plain. “This is nothing my clients have escaped from unscathed,” he said. “They’re still paying for this flood plain property.”
Szladewski, with the help of a neighbor, keeps the lone road in the development graded. But land that he paid $4,000 an acre for has been appraised at $500.
He said he relied on the word of a salesman “and got taken. They told me it was recorded subdivision. They promise to fix the roads. They say they build a nice entrance to subdivision, something beautiful. We have nothing.”
Szladewski said he figured the subdivision would be well maintained when he was told Shepard would be his neighbor. “And Louie Welch, they say he build on lot 11 or 12.
“In Poland, I learn nobody cheats in America because everybody helps each other. If one person’s house burns, neighbors build another. That was America in my mind.”
In the Park Place subdivision off Dobbin Huffsmith Road, residents are hoping Attorney General Jim Mattox’s lawsuit against the developer will stop an odor the development on hot, humid days.
Mattox visited the recorded subdivision in 1984, declaring it unlivable. He then sued developer C.L. Conner, alleging he misrepresented that septic systems would work in the subdivision’s soil.
Residents want the developer to install a central sewage system or buy them out.
“When the wind blows just right, the smell can knock you over. It’s like living in a cesspool,” said resident Ralph Schafer, who chose the mobile home subdivision as his retirement home four years ago. He paid $10,000 for his lot.
“I wouldn’t have paid that much if it weren’t for all the amenities promised. They advertised this place like your favorite vacation resort. My wife and I used to like Las Vegas, but boy, this is no where close. My wife is even ashamed to have friends over to dinner because of the smell.”
Schafer and other residents say they were promised 24-hour security and recreational facilities that never materialized.
Conner claims the soil is suitable for septic tanks but several residents had systems improperly installed. He denies misrepresenting the development, and said he sued his contractor for not completing road shoulders.
Park Place civic association president Wuensche said residents suing over the septic systems have proof they were inspected by the county.
She is convinced a lingering kidney infection was caused by the problem with septic overflow.
“Our drinking water is well water and if the sewage is seeping into the ground, it would be in our water,” she said. “I had a $3,000 water-filter system put in and have had no problem since.
“The sad thing about situations like this is you’ve got so much money invested and you’re just stuck.”
Joe and Judy Patterson, residents of The Wilderness subdivision southwest of Conroe, can sympathize. They purchased 18 acres last year and were not told by salesmen that the development could be under water in a few years, the potential site for the Lake Creek reservoir.
“It’s not so much the things they did tell us, it’s the things they didn’t,” said Mrs. Patterson. “We were misled on a lot of things.”
The couple was told that the dirt roads would be graded by nearby oil company workers.
“And that’s not true,” said Patterson who has repaired the suspension on his new truck twice within a year because of the rugged roads.
“We’d like to sell,” he said. “But where are you going to find another fool like us?”
——–
Hapa1234 wrote:
IF THE DEVELOPERS OWNED MOST OF THE DEFUNK SAVINGS AND LOANS INDUSTRY BACK IN THE 1980S UNDER THE REAGAN – BUSH {41} ERA WITH THE FORMER SEC CHAIR AND CIA {WILLIAM CASEY, ET AL}, WHY WASN’T NEIL BUSH AND NORM BROWNSTEIN {AIPAC} EVER INDICATED OR CHARGED SINCE THEY HAVE BECAME A PART OF THE “VICHEY” SHADOW GOVERNMENT FOR YEARS WITH NO ACCOUNTABLITY. ABRAMOFF WAS SNARED WITH THE MOB LINKED FLORIDA SUN CRUZ CASINO WHILE BROWNSTEIN’S FORMER EMPLOYEE AND THE FORMER DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR’S GALE NORTON POLITICAL ORGANIZATION, WITH HER CONVICTED DEPUTY, STEPHEN GRILES BOTH DISAPPEARED INTO A HUGE POLITICAL COVER UP IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC WITH DISMISSED U.S. ATTORNEY FREDERICK BLACK……A POLITICAL PATTERN LATER FOR GONZO-GATE AND ROVE WITH FUTURE U.S. ATTORNEY’S NOT TOWING THE POLITICAL LINE FOR COVER UPS OR GOP AGENDAS FROM WASHINGTON DC.
Jun 28, 2019 · The WORLD FAMOUS Bank Frauds, Lootings, Money Laundering and other Violations of the Law in the BIRCHFIELD CASE effect the RESEARCH TEAM , Judson Witham Directly as the LAST FOUR DECADES of Banking Debacles, Savings and Loan Scandals, BAIL OUTS and ECONOMIC Collapses have DIRECTLY Caused Monetary Damages to the RESEARCH TEAM and Judson Witahm …
Deutsche Bank has been dragged into the money laundering scandal surrounding Danske Bank, with the firm acting as correspondent bank for the Danish bank. Deutsche Bank has been dragged into the money laundering scandal surrounding Danske Bank, with the firm acting as correspondent bank for the Danish bank. Contact us. … Judson Witham.
MAFIA DON’s Financiers Deutsche Bank and “The” COMPANY … Bushs Obamas Clintons Bidens Pelosis and the DC Swamp Exposed’ Millionaires Row LAKE GEORGE the NWO; Mortgage Fraud Bank Looting Money Laundering Land Swindles …. Judson Witham; Non-Border Red Flag Wildcat Unrecorded Illegal Paper Ghost Toxic Zombie Colonias Subdivisions
May 31, 2017 · Deutsche Bank AG agreed to pay $41 million to settle Federal Reserve allegations that its U.S. operations failed to maintain adequate protections against money laundering, the latest in a string …
MAFIA DON’s Financiers Deutsche Bank and “The” COMPANY … Bushs Obamas Clintons Bidens Pelosis and the DC Swamp Exposed’ Millionaires Row LAKE GEORGE the NWO; Mortgage Fraud Bank Looting Money Laundering Land Swindles …. Judson Witham; Non-Border Red Flag Wildcat Unrecorded Illegal Paper Ghost Toxic Zombie Colonias Subdivisions
Deutsche Bank probes $6 billion suspected money laundering: source Transactions conducted over a period of years are being investigated, and the sum could exceed $6 billion, the source said, adding that the internal probe of the possible abuse being conducted by Deutsche Bank is in its initial stages.
The central players in the Deutsche Bank money laundering scandal, which gained media attention in late 2016 include: Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank is a global German banking and financial services company with more than 100,000 employees in over 70 countries and a large presence in Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific.
Judson Witham Mispression of Felonies, Cover Up The Great Texas Bank Job Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:59 207.160.231.7 If you are correct, and I have seen bigger surprises … Wholesale funding and the increase in construction bank …
May 08, 2018 · Criminal Charges: On April 23, 2015, DB Group Services (UK) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank), was charged with and pleaded guilty before a magistrate judge to wire fraud for its role in manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a leading benchmark interest rate used in financial products and …
Dec 13, 2018 · We are in the process of trying to complete the theft judgment affidavit on this file, however the one that was received has the Plaintiff as DEUTSCHE BANK AS TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS AS TRUSTEE FOR GMAC-RFC MASTER SERVICING. We have the plaintiff as U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2006-QSB.
The Justice Department sued Deutsche Bank AG, one of the world’s 10 biggest banks by assets, on Tuesday for at least $1 billion for defrauding taxpayers by “repeatedly” lying to a federal agency when securing taxpayer-backed insurance for thousands of shoddy mortgages. MortgageIT, a subsidiary of …
Jan 04, 2017 · Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $95 million to resolve a U.S. government lawsuit accusing the German bank of tax fraud for using “insolvent” shell …
Deutsche Bank is an unwieldy institution with headquarters in Frankfurt and about a hundred thousand employees in seventy countries. When it was founded, in 1870, its stated purpose was to …
Cyber Fraud Prevention. Due to new regulations such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Payment Service Directive 2 (PSD2), Deutsche Bank introduces DB Secure Authenticator to ensure it is strengthening the security around clients’ data online. DB Secure Authenticator is a new app available on iOS and Android which allows users of …
“Deutsche Bank is a classic [case of] ‘control fraud,’” said William K. Black, associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He explained that …
Jun 07, 2010 · REVERSED – North Carolina Court of Appeals in the Matter of the Foreclosure in Re Adams … the assistant secretary of Deutsche Bank for Soundview—an out-of-state entity—as well as the in-person testimony offered by Ms. Cole indicated that Deutsche Bank for Soundview is the current holder of the Note and Deed of Trust. … deutsche bank …
Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins – 2008 – Preview – More editionsThis volume covers American law from the earliest settlement and colonization of North America.
next friend — One acting without formal appointment as guardian for the benefit of an infant or person of unsound mind not judicially declared incompetent, or other person under some disability. This disability often arises from minority, mental incapacity, or lack of access to counsel. A next friend has full power over the proceedings in the action as if he or she were an ordinary plaintiff, until a guardian or guardian ad litem is appointed in the case; but the next friend is entitled to present evidence only on the same basis as any other witness. One use of next friend status was in connection with many suits brought by detainees at Guantanamo Bay before the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006. Another case arose following the Monkey selfie affair, when the animal rights organization People for Ethical Treatment of Animals sued photographer David Slater, asserting itself as the next friend of a Celebes crested macaque. When a relative who is next of kin acts as a next friend for a person, that person is sometimes instead described as the natural guardian of the person.
A McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a court of law in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia by prompting, taking notes and quietly giving advice.
They need not be legally trained or have any professional legal qualifications.
The right to a McKenzie friend was established in the 1970 case of McKenzie v McKenzie.[1] Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area and the presumption is heavily in favour of admitting a McKenzie friend into court.[2] He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person[citation needed] but is not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
A similar, modified principle exists in Singapore. The role is distinct from that of a next friend or of an amicus curiae.
NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “Unauthorized practice of law.” The power of the States to control the practice of law cannot be exercised so as to abrogate federally protected rights. NAACP v. Button,371 U.S. 415 (1963); Sperry v. Florida,373 U.S. 379 (1963)
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972). Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973). “Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who ‘takes on the mantel of sovereign’,”
“The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) “The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A association is not license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same….
by SE Baldwin – 1917 – Cited by 11 – Related articles founded in 1865, met in 1877, in Saratoga, New York. It had long had a ….. a meeting of leading lawyers at Saratoga, N. Y., August 21st 1878, to discuss the …
The Abolition Riot of 1836 took place in Boston, Massachusetts (U.S.) in the Massachusetts …. Another accused Sewall of disgracing the legal profession and called for his censure by the bar for “instigating a mob of negroes to perpetrate an act …
This is a timeline of the history of the city of Boston, US. This is a dynamic list and may never be …. Samuel Turell Armstrong becomes mayor. Abolition Riot of 1836 ….. MuckRock headquartered in Boston. Island Creek Oyster Bar in business.
Before I ever studied law I used to argue occasionally with lawyers – a ….. was constitutional this year which had been unconstitutional only last year, then even …
No lawyer will like this book. It isn’t written for lawyers. It is written for the average man and its purpose is to try to plant in his head, at the least, a seed of skepticism about the whole legal profession, its works and its ways. In case anyone should be interested, I got my own skepticism early. Before I ever studied law I used to argue occasionally with lawyers – a foolish thing to do at any time. When, as frequently happened, they couldn’t explain their legal points so that they made any sense to me I brashly began to suspect that maybe they didn’t make any sense at all. But I couldn’t know. One of the reasons I went to law school was to try to find out. At law school I was lucky. Ten of the men under whom I took courses were sufficiently skeptical and common-sensible about the branches of law they were teaching so that, unwittingly of course, they served together to fortify my hunch about the phoniness of the whole legal process. In a sense, they are the intellectual godfathers of this book. And though all of them would doubtless strenuously disown their godchild, I think I owe it to them to name them. Listed alphabetically, they are: Thurman Arnold, now Assistant Attorney-General of the United States; Charles E. Clark, now Judge of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; William O’ Douglas, now Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court; Felix Frankfurter, now Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court; Leon Green, now Dean of the Northwestern University Law School; Walton Hamilton, Professor of Law at Yale University; Harold Laski, Professor of Political Science at the London School of Economics; Richard Joyce Smith, now a practicing attorney in New York City; Wesley Sturges, now Director of the Distilled Spirits Institute; and the late Lee Tulin. By the time I got through law school, I had decided that I never wanted to practice law. I never have. I am not a member of any bar. If anyone should want, not unreasonably, to know what on earth I am doing – or trying to do – teaching law, he may find a hint of the answer toward the end of Chapter IX. When I was mulling over the notion of writing this book, I outlined my ideas about the book, and about the law, to a lawyer who is not only able but also extraordinarily frank and perceptive about his profession. “Sure,” he said, “but why give the show away?” That clinched it.
“The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
“The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, An association is not license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same….
Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins – 2008 – Preview – More editionsThis volume covers American law from the earliest settlement and colonization of North America.
WHAT IS A NEXT OF FRIEND
See next friend — One acting without formal appointment as guardian for the benefit of an infant or person of unsound mind not judicially declared incompetent, or other person under some disability. This disability often arises from minority, mental incapacity, or lack of access to counsel.
A next friend has full power over the proceedings in the action as if he or she were an ordinary plaintiff, until a guardian or guardian ad litem is appointed in the case; but the next friend is entitled to present evidence only on the same basis as any other witness.
The McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a court of law in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia by prompting, taking notes and quietly giving advice.
They need not be legally trained or have any professional legal qualifications.
The right to a McKenzie friend was established in the 1970 case of McKenzie v McKenzie.[1] Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area and the presumption is heavily in favour of admitting a McKenzie friend into court.[2] He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person[citation needed] but is not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
A similar, modified principle exists in Singapore. The role is distinct from that of a next friend or of an amicus curiae.
NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “Unauthorized practice of law.”
The power of the States to control the practice of law cannot be exercised so as to abrogate federally protected rights. NAACP v. Button,371 U.S. 415 (1963); Sperry v. Florida,373 U.S. 379 (1963)
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972). Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973). “Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who ‘takes on the mantel of sovereign’,”
“The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) “The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A association is not license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same….
The [Plymouth] colony’s first trained lawyer, Thomas Lechford, did little to instill enthusiasm. He was disbarred for trying to influence a jury. Antilawyer sentiment was pervasive elsewhere as well, and the “ancient English prejudice against lawyers secured new strength in America.” The framers of the Fundamental Constitutions of the Carolinas in 1669 declared it a “base and vile thing to plead for money or reward.” Connecticut and Virginia during a portion of the seventeenth century prohibited lawyers from practicing. Early lawyers were often laymen helping friends or women serving the legal interests of absent husbands. (Hall 21-22)
Still, despite the opposition to lawyers–perhaps arising from the complex and seemingly arbitrary rules of the early common-law system–the complexity of colonial legal life (each part of the colonies tended to have its own legal rules which more-or-less approximated some part of the very complex English system), and the importance of smoothing out trade, meant that lawyers became increasingly valued. Although there were no law schools, a “rough apprenticeship” process, along with self-teaching, emerged to prepare attorneys.
But unlike in England, according to Hall and Karsten, there was never sufficient legal business to justify splitting the profession into barristers and solicitors. Instead, “American lawyers survived as generalists” (Hall 22).
It was not until after the Revolution that some moves to formalize legal training emerged, but even though Harvard, Yale and Columbia started legal training in the mid-nineteenth century, it wasn’t until the late nineteenth and early twentieth century that the law school system as we know it today developed.
The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. This acclaimed narrative history examines how law has influenced American social, political, economic, and cultural events, as well as how those events inevitably influenced the law itself, from the earliest English settlements to 2007.
The Fifth Amendment provides that federal prosecutions for capital or otherwise infamous crimes must be [350 U.S. 359, 362] instituted by presentments or indictments of grand juries. But neither the Fifth Amendment nor any other constitutional provision prescribes the kind of evidence upon which grand juries must act. The grand jury is an English institution, brought to this country by the early colonists and incorporated in the Constitution by the Founders. There is every reason to believe that our constitutional grand jury was intended to operate substantially like its English progenitor. The basic purpose of the English grand jury was to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes. Grand jurors were selected from the body of the people and their work was not hampered by rigid procedural or evidential rules. In fact, grand jurors could act on their own knowledge and were free to make their presentments or indictments on such information as they deemed satisfactory. Despite its broad power to institute criminal proceedings the grand jury grew in popular favor with the years. It acquired an independence in England free from control by the Crown or judges. Its adoption in our Constitution as the sole method for preferring charges in serious criminal cases shows the high place it held as an instrument of justice. And in this country as in England of old the grand jury has convened as a body of laymen, free from technical rules, acting in secret, pledged to indict no one because of prejudice and to free no one because of special favor. As late as 1927 an English historian could say that English grand juries were still free to act on their own knowledge if they pleased to do so. 5 And in 1852 Mr. Justice Nelson on circuit could say “No case has been cited, nor have we been able to find any, furnishing an authority for looking into and revising the judgment of the grand jury upon the evidence, for the purpose of [350 U.S. 359, 363] determining whether or not the finding was founded upon sufficient proof . . . .” United States v. Reed, 27 Fed. Cas. 727, 738.
In political philosophy, the right of revolution (or right of rebellion) is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without cause. Stated throughout history in one form or another, the belief in this right has been used to justify various revolutions, including the American Revolution, French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the Iranian Revolution.
RIGHT OF REVOLUTION. The right of revolution is not a right that is defined and protected by the Constitution but a natural right. It would be absurd for a constitution to authorize revolutionary challenges to its authority. However, it would not have been absurd for the preamble to the Constitution to have acknowledged the right of revolution, as, for example, the preamble to the pennsylvania …
The Right of Revolution exists outside of government. The Right of Revolution is inextricably linked to our most basic right, the Right of Self-Preservation. We are endowed with Rights from our Prime Creator. The Bill of Rights and this statement in the Declaration were meant as warnings to the newly created government of the United States.
Carl Becker, the late, eminent Cornell University historian, in his book The Declaration of Independence, argued that the famous second paragraph of the Declaration is “a frank assertion of the…
dictionary.sensagent.com/Right of revolution/en-en
Origins
Use in History
The Right of Revolution as An Individual Or Collective Right
Duty Versus Right
Preconditions to The Right of Revolution
Natural Law Or Positive Law
See Also
External Links
The right of revolution was perhaps first articulated as part of an official state philosophy by the Zhou Dynasty (1122 – 256 BC) of China. To justify their overthrowing of the earlier Shang Dynasty, the Zhou kings promulgated the concept known as the Mandate of Heaven, that Heaven would bless the authority of a just ruler, but would be displeased and withdraw its mandate from a despotic ruler. The Mandate of Heaven would then transfer to those who would rule best. Chinese historians interpre…
What others called the right of resistance or the right of revolution is at bottom the natural right of preservation. The supporting case was developed with bold thought and cautious speech by John Locke, whose Second Treatise(no. 2) rightly was regarded by many of the Founders as a fit
In political philosophy, the right of rebellion (or right of revolution) is the right or duty, variously stated throughout history, of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests. Belief in this right extends back to ancient China, and it has been used throughout history to justify various rebellions, including the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.
You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.
Why do this?
Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.
The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.
To help you get started, here are a few questions:
Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
What topics do you think you’ll write about?
Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?
You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.
Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.
When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.
10%
cash back
Law for the Layman 